ago. Overlord has changed a bunch of things when it comes to vassals and such. How to Manage Empire Size in Stellaris. Give me the most broken empire you have. I'm crushing on tall on hardest on my current game, dominant by the 2300's, overwhelming by 2400. Welcome to the patricians way to play Stellaris. 0 making playing tall a viable strategy. WebShaman • 6 yr. Ethics, Civics, Traditions and other choices strongly support or hinder certain Playstyles. It is great for high difficulties because you don’t have to attack the really powerful empires and can get them to pathetic by mid to late game. Stellaris. Sorry mate but it kinda sounds more like you are just being a sore loser here. It has factiond designed for playing tall. 2, I must say that I enjoy 3. 416K subscribers in the Stellaris community. 8 Archetype Play-stylespared to read, better leave. 2. But wide in Stellaris doesnt require any more work to maintain and keep stable, so its hard to ever make Tall the more viable option without changes that just make playing wide miserable. r/Stellaris. (Not super-tall though, as in one planet, but only 8 planets and about 16 systems at present. Step 3. More planets/habitats means more resources means bigger fleets, etc. With that being said, playing tall in Stellaris is a lot harder than you think! How, then, can you get started playing tall in this game? Keep reading to discover our comprehensive guide! Set Your Limits How to play tall? I thought the changes to unity, particularly the planetary ascension mechanic, would make it ideal for a corporate empire to play tall, so I gave it a shot. In terms of strong tall builds that actually perform well, there are basically only two: Habitat Spam, and the Nihilistic Acquisition Raider. Is there any viable way to play void devellers besides commerce-tech build P. 7) ASpec 195K subscribers Join Subscribe 6. Yes, and this is not Civ 5, this Stellaris. There is the playing tall strategy. This can boost its trade value over 80%. Trying to conquer whole empire's as soon as met them and have a stronger fleet. But the tall/wide distinction isn’t all that meaningful in Stellaris — you’re still managing more worlds and taking up more empire size, just in a smaller geographical space. Compare Stellaris. That's when the mandatory late game genocide comes in handy. If you play as a non gestalt empire you can invest your influence into arcology projects for city planets. 3 update is attempting to make playing "tall" more of a thing by changing some systems, like empire sprawl, so that a well developed tall empire is closer in power to a wide empire. It's not about having fewer planets, but about having less directly controlled space. So a big issue with the proposed addition of sprawl penalties to pops (in addition to systems, planets and districts) is that it is a huge nerf to the tall strategy, which is bad since wide is already the clearly dominant strategy (since the tech/tradition penalty directly benefits "tall" play vs "wide" play, but is widely regarded as being. Part 2 focuses on creating your civilization both in and out of game. Playing tall may make that a waste of a perk though. I don't want to own any vassals. Imo the best definition of play wide is a lot of systems. /rantThe second vassal everyone will want is the Scholarium, who provides a significant bonus to research potential and valuable science tribute. Been playing stellaris for a little bit now let’s say a couple of months and I was wondering if playing tall is worth it I’ve heard mixed opinions on the topic but if it is worth it could you all give me some tips!Well there is a method of playing 'tall'. If I'm playing tall, I'm aiming to keep my empire size below 100. With that in mind I think it's a step in the right direction for that kind of. With the changes made in 3. Mind you, even when playing tall, I don't build them, I'd rather. Two strategies stand out when we talk about empire size. Intro Stellaris Tall Guide Montu Plays 130K subscribers Subscribe Subscribed 3. 2; 1; Reactions: Reply. 7. In Stellaris you can't colonize a planet or build a habitat without claiming a system. Generally, there are 3 strategies you can mix and match. building tall is more of an opening strategy, not a long term playstyle. Get a migration treaty immediately so you can get access to other species. Paradox, Please Let Us Play Tall. OPS is an excruciatingly tall play-style, but I do promise you'll pick up interchangeable skills that'll enhance your tall play. After 2. Tall doesn't mean you can't expand. Realistically when going tall it means some small set of orbital mines and research stations that weren't your core priority anyways - the core priority ones were covered by your frontier outposts to begin with. Hold chokepoints and rush tech, make friends and sign commercial pacts, start a trade league as soon as possible once you have one close ally, spam corporate embassies in your branch offices, and very soon you will be the only. Those people are wrong, as are you. A "tall" empire's colonies aren't going to be much stronger or more populated than a wide empire's colonies. Tall doesn't mean you can't expand. The meta has shifted a lot throughout Stellaris’s life cycle and will likely shift a lot more in the future. You can do quite well by building a few colonies on nice big planets, and using wars to establish a lot of vassals and tributaries. This is going to be my updated take on the basic builds. ago. Totally viable. One of the simplest ways is to either stand on a chair or wear high heels but it's not very comfortable on the long run. You will be slightly less ahead, as the AI here is much better at tech, but still a massive lead. Very high output per system for when your packed in. • 2 yr. Worth noting that the "drag" on research from empire size is pretty much the most negatively impactful (mechanically-speaking) aspect of a galaxy-spanning empire (i. Kind of wish there were multiple assembly slots. I would say the same happens playing tall. Unless something major crops up, the next Stellaris update is expected to be the 3. Playing tall in Stellaris has always been a mean and not an end. Low empire size penalties. ago. Right now it is not viable to play a small/tall empire. It is inspired by EUIV’s province development feature, which allows countries with a few provinces to be able to match or even be better than countries with more but less lucrative provinces. 724Unfortunately there is no current way to play the way you want. Makes every world a fortress so just expand enough to have planet choke points then turtle with dedicated tech worlds. 4 planets that are high ascension level and low empire sprawl is tall, since in current Stellaris, each planet is basically the equivalent to an entire city in a game like Civilization. I'm a poor guy, can't afford the DLC. #12. We have "wide with many systems" and "wide with few systems, but those systems contain thirty billion habitats". Admin cap is super important since you're more sensitive to sprawl penalty. Techno Necro. It is my philosophy, and thus the mod's, that a 'Tall' empire is one with. "Playing tall" in Stellaris is always purely a roleplaying decision. The extra difficulty in higher difficulties is getting to where you can get to late game. Tall isn't viable nothing in the beta makes tall viable. That being said, if your definition of tall is "just 10 or 20 systems", you could go for a ringworld rush and just fill those 20 systems with them. . If you aren't trying to min-max, you'll be happy, and if your empire is big enough, it wont matter anyway However you decide to play, have fun!Stellaris Galactic Paragons DLC has given us the Crusader civic and the Under One Rule Origin. Hegemon. Tall v wide is a bit of a false construct in stellaris specifically (always has been). And yes, having only say, 10-15 systems and using habitats and stuff to build them up is playing tall. The player "developed" these systems to the heights of their abilities, using Habitats and Ringworlds. Essentially, tall and wide shouldn’t be wildly different as far as pop count goes. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. Title says it all. The tall vs wide playstyle has devolved from: tall (low systems low planets) vs wide (many systems many planets) to a new style of tall (low systems many planets/Habs) vs wide as it was before. If you spreadsheeted the numbers for the old sprawl system, the best empire size for optimal tech output was around 20 planets, which is much larger than most people would consider to be tall, and even then such an empire's tech advantage only started to be. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. Empire sprawl is still used by the community, and the terms are interchangeable. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Hyndis • Additional comment actions. . Indentured Servitude is the best kind of slavery, as it has the fewest job restrictions. That destroys federations) remove term limit. It's not about having few planets - in fact you should still get as many ( properly developed!!Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. 48. I always run into economic defects, Overpopulation and being serounded by larger empire's. Think about it like this: A 25k fleet will cost around 15-20k minerals, and a 25k starbase will cost about the same, but a 25k fleet takes roughly 300 minerals per month in upkeep. Sero Mar 25 @ 2:18am. You cannot go tall, becuase you have already cut off your legs and stumped your hands by going standard hive. TLDR, I think tall isnt dead, it is just more gradient. Tall vs Wide. Compare Stellaris to a game where you can play tall, and playing tall is strong: Civ 5. Tall Machine Empire, what to spend influence on? Thread starter roboemperor; Start date May 17, 2018; Jump to latest Follow Reply Menu We have. 0. 2 and before) because a wide and a "tall" empires will grow at the same rate, to about the same cap, with only some minor buffs for "tall" like mastery of nature that don't even come into play until later. As quill is trying to get 200 years of peace achievement. Cons: Lots of micro, allows for a degree of dabbling in tall play for otherwise wide empires. Tall since well, ever, hasn’t been a great option but now more. tall mechanism, so you are not forced to conquer new territories to become stronger. Use the outpost cost ethic and build plenty of outposts. That's what 2. In fact it could be easier with more resources. Warscore, the fleet manager, land warfare, etc. A tall empire gets the resource benefit without the sprawl cost. Weekly PSA's PSA- the definition of playing wide is disputed, and many people use systems as opposed to planets as the model in Stellaris. The problems with Stellaris, tall empires, 3. Evokes a kind of 'hazard warning' feeling. It ends up being. Generally it's not really practical to play tall without the Void Dwellers origin as you would need insane luck to have a good. The current raiding playstyle (whether from civic or ascension perk) is worthless. Many people seem to have a misconception what "tall" means in Stellaris. So for Tall vs Wide in Stellaris, your start location matters a lot more than your empire build. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. Playing tall will give you a hefty chunk of feeling like a plotter, a devious schemer who carefully plans his eventual ascension to near godhood. The game actually requires a heavy amount of micromanagement, sectors or not. Galactic footprint is a common usage for "wide vs tall" so you're not wrong, but op is correct in terms of game mechanics. Communal: Since you’re going to be playing tall, stuffing more people in houses is useful. 2; Reactions: Reply. Technocracy is amazing for more research gains. Empire strategy that minimizes empire size. It does require playing the game a lot differently than previously though. Go away from modifying Empire Size to balance them. In some updates, it was a very effective strategy to get ahead technologically and get early ascensions - it's much less the case now. I would say your focus should instead be on securing defensible chokepoints against your neighbors and grabbing any important resources in your vicinity. 87 Badges. I have two flavours playing stellaris, super nice super diplomatic empire or devouring swarm. all right. The game design of Stellaris will always favor wide over tall. This reduces the number of different buildings you expect to build on each planet. It doesn't work in Stellaris (at least in 3. For a one-system challenge the best (but not most. Internal struggles. In just one year, that's 3600 minerals conserved. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. I could just settle and terraform more planets to make more stations, but that is a long term and expensive process. This is the truth. Empire sprawl will stay low if you play tall which allows you to tech up and tradition ascend at fast rate. If you make playing wide miserable thats bad too, because for many painting the map is. It is way to easy to spam Burocrats to avoid any penalties from rapid expansion. Also a way to request/provide economic assistance and ships when you are attacked would be really good. Empire size has changed a lot over the years in Stellaris. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. If you stick to 10 systems and spam a bunch of habitats you are playing tall. Outside of this there is no "Tall" concept in Stellaris as more. Megacorp fits very neatly for tall empires, given trade's (somewhat) reduced reliance on planets and pops, and their penalty to empire size. 3 a LOT. But in Stellaris it seems rather doubtful if you could play tall instead of wide. stellaris is a dynamic game, and rebellions and other events always change up the galaxy. "Tall" no longer exists in versions after that change. 3. You can no longer colonize large swaths of space with a vassal swarm either. Key ethic: Fanatic PacifistKey civic: Beacon of LibertyKey trait: Docile/Streamlined Protocols Key traditions: Dom. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of how to play a Tall empire. The pop growth bonus in particular is also augmented by the bonuses of xenophobe, for a possible 30% base pop growth. So you can play builds that are better at tall but your going to lose out late game. Given that in civ you can win without conquering anything, a tall empire doesn't have to transition to a wide empire, but in stellaris there isn't much to do if you don't conquer people, and given the way how the research and productions currently work, playing tall is not a very valid choice unless you become boxed in very early on. Given that EUIV’s features aren’t currently available in Stellaris, the. It is a very rough start. By building robots and getting % pop growth speed modifiers. After a while, re-change your pops so that those on habitats get great specialist traits and those on planets get good worker traits. Playing tall helps with the overwhelming amount of micro that Stellaris sometimes requires. You need about 100 complex drones on a single planet (IE ring worlds or Ecumenopoli) for each bio trophy to be equal to a single robot and that is the RS's biggest issue. You can still play that way. Stellaris Tall vs Wide, which is better? Wide, the answer is wide. CryptoDeveloping Planets - Play Tall! This mod allows you to develop planets. There's also the issue that Stellaris really hasn't had a defined tall playstyle throughout its history. 130K views 5 years ago. 3 comments. What are some key things to do in Stellaris to build tall effectively? I want to play tall because I have been a wide, rapid expansionist in playstyle in basically every 4x/grand strategy game I've played. Tall builds could opt for a characteristic that gives them a tech boost but at the cost of maybe doubling the influence needed for outposts. To me, playing tall means investing resources in things that increase the efficiency of your pops, which allows you to produce roughly the. Some used up to 14. I don't understand how playing tall in this game works. 8. There are a few common Playstyle types and each type will face similar issues regardless of how the galaxy was created. In stellaris many consider playing tall means few systems. 2) Optimize Production Methods edict An edict with a base cost of 300 influence and a base duration of 10 years that increases resources from jobs by 50%. The 0,1 penalty is the +10% penalty per system other than the first one. Spoken like someone who isn’t even seven feet tall! Step 1: get boxed in by superior powers. As I understand, the point is to focus on research and traditions and less so on economy, but I'm trying a tall run now and it feels like everything's sorta slow since my research speed is at 10, 7. I'm RPing a Determined Exterminator empire that doesn't want to grow…Honestly, walls like this I can live with, it's when the AI is blatantly pulling things out of it's ass it should have no way of obtaining that I start rage-quitting. Tall vs Wide is now about unity. It doesn't mean it must be. I'm crushing on tall on hardest on my current game, dominant by the 2300's, overwhelming by 2400. 23. Go for Bio-Ascension for cloning vats. They would be also wrong. . Those would be some of the most basic types of non-linear mechanic which could make Tall play start to exist. Though 25x crises was a serious challenge. This is really very unplayable for me, i hate playing wide, and playing tall I just. This may promote a "tall" growth of your empire, certainly helped by the presence of the Ecumenopolis, however this is a strategy that still has to find its place in the Stellaris meta. The core mechanics of Stellaris are absolutely compatible with Tall vs Wide, it is just that wide has had repeated postive improvements over the course of the games development, frequently at the expense of tall play. Even if we never get a way to truly play tall, we still need to fix the current pop growth model (dominated by how many worlds contribute their base 3. Start playing on easy mode in an empire that you don't like to play, then set up a goal like geting the worm to terraform your planets and then try to play as robotic ascencion, something stupid or boringly difficult. Stellaris is probably the best paradox game to play tall because stellaris. We will use these. Tall vs wide isn’t really something that makes sense in context of stellaris or real history. but I don't know how to get any resources any other way. Empire Sprawl needs a rework. Since you play pretty much the same if you have 50 habitats rather. The faster you can do it, the less likely other corps can get them from you. In practice this means you build Habitats, Ring-Worlds, Dyson Sphere and Science Nexus. The problem is that it wasn't obvious because of. . First things first; your ethics should be materialist. In Stellaris people get a legit advice wide's always better and than come with screenshots of 90 planets, 900 pops asking why are they having problems. I think it would be cool if there was a terraformable slider. I would say going tall is even more viable now. The problems with Stellaris, tall empires, 3. When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. First things first; your ethics should be materialist-authoritarian-militarist or fanatic materialist-militarist. InflationCold3591. I’m just worried how long it’ll hold an attack back later (I’ve already fought a war to a draw by throwing them back 4. Clone army with the Ascendant path since you get 100 pops with +40% ruler output and +20% specialist output. Diogenes_of_Sparta Specialist • 2 yr. In 3. 0 playing "tall" was nebulous at best. that's the cure. Though I do think it will be similar to other gs games were playing wide is by far the best strategy and building tall is more something to do while waiting for the next war or something. If you want you can call this "its dead", but as long some people write a guide, there is a way to play tall. Playing as a corporation is a good way to play tall because 1) the managing is up to the AI so you just upgrade when their population reaches a certain point and 2) it opens you up to the galaxy through business, rather than just through diplomacy. Even though there are many reasons why players might want to play tall, Stellaris indeed lacks functionalities that provide incentives for tall play (unless you count the negative incentive of planet & pop management). You could do a subterranean origin with lithoid using reanimator civic…. Also without guaranteed worlds if your unlucky you're forced to go to war or go tall. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. If you end up in an empty corner of the galaxy with a lot of space to yourself, playing tall is just a pure handicap. Pick Aptitude as your first tradition to get +1 trait. That is, you stay small for some time so you can: - focus on science. Tall is restricting yourself to playing with fewer colonies and avoiding outward expansion. For how to: watch some of montuplays newest guides regarding playing tall. Go fanatic xenophile. . For this approach, you'd want origins that can benefit as early as possible from. Playing tall is not only possible, it's insanely powerful and (on Insane), I am always the most powerful empire in the galaxy by 2400. Playing tall is naturally going to be somewhat more difficult in most cases, as you are essentially intentionally cutting your growth short. habitats as well as branch offices contribute to empire size. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of. Best. Friendly-General-723 Collective Consciousness 8 mo. Jul 10, 2023. It gets in my way of actually being able to play. large number of poorly developed planets. Beginner's guide to Stellaris. Playing tall finally is viable and I don't feel forced to expand non-stop without trade-offs. but what tall is or isn't is another debate I suppose and I didn't feel confident in getting any points across without using the terminology. So a big issue with the proposed addition of sprawl penalties to pops (in addition to systems, planets and districts) is that it is a huge nerf to the tall strategy, which is bad since wide is already the clearly dominant strategy (since the tech/tradition penalty directly benefits "tall" play vs "wide" play, but is widely regarded as being. Play tall on the short term, get bio ascension, make sturdy and strong pops, then start a conquering spree. 3 and my solutions for it. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. 2. With that just build as much farming and later industry and become. Stellaris was released in 2016, and it's only been six years. Wide means you have more variety of planets and has its own fun to it. r/Stellaris • Tall vs Wide is really an issue with a Unity not being competetive with Science. Stellaris Tall Build Guide. The best way to play is to have as close to zero empire size whilst having the biggest science income. 273 upvotes · 38 comments. 6. Hey guys, I'm not very good at this game, i played 3 times on ensign now and i have not really become more powerful than other civilizations. Throw Energy. If you play habitats you can get more resources from jobs without actually taking up more space. So in Stellaris this would probably be a habitat/megastructure heavy playstyle and trying to do things that give you extra districts on your planets. Yup. There are others (edict upkeep + tradition cost) but the research penalty seems to be the most meaningful part given how rapidly a high. . Yeah, I actually agree I don't think Stellaris really has 'tall' playstyles because of the way pops and economics work, I don't think you so much as play tall, but as varying levels of efficient. Your civics should be Private Prospectors (you can use energy credits to build colony ships and you get a -33% empire sprawl from systems). Megastructures aren't the only way to succeed when playing tall. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. You'll have tall/wide elements in all empires depending on how you play, whether you're role-playing or not, whether you're playing single or multi and also your ethos and civics. Jump to latest Follow Reply. Fluffy-Tanuki Agrarian Idyll • 4 mo. "Tall" no longer exists in versions after that change. Stellaris isn't designed for playing tall really. In previous patches, especially before 3. Playstyles are how a player plans to tackle playing or even winning the game. I never played a Tall game before and usually rarely peaceful lol But sounds like a lot fun. Currently in 2. There are many other strategy games where this is a very applicable concept, as there are penalties and downsides to growing bigger that can make your empire less. Considering the asking price I suggest of buying this DLC only if you are interested in playing as a Megacorp or if you already have a good selection of DLCs. Wide and Tall isn’t a stellaris definition, it’s used in many strategy games. HopeFox • 6 yr. Empire Size currently provides a rubber band on big empires being better than small empires. If you play at lower difficulties, then the game is designed to be a chill roleplaying experience. Planets and habitats within the same system counts as one system (but all there pops go towards pops penalty) The 0,01 penalty is the 1% penalty to research for each pop over 10 you have in your kingdom. . Every game I'm like "okay in gonna find the nearest choke points and play tall" and never actually do unless I get boxed in. This is going to be my updated take on the basic builds. "Tall" generally refers to playing with fewer colonies, which is an important distinction. The concept of playing tall is not a fixed one, it kinda depends on how you see it. You use the early bonuses to advantage early-mid game expansion and transitioning into a wide. . I would say going tall is even more viable now. Okay, first things first, if. 4; 4; 3; Reactions: Reply. When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. And it can help a lot of your species has traits like intelligent or strong to take advantage of the bonuses, every plus 5% can help your empire survive longer. This is in part due to victory conditions which allow a "tall" strategy to work throughout the game, but also because you can leverage your "tall" advantages into a temporary tech advantage at the right times to break out as a large conqueror -- you don't need to. What actually constitutes tall in this game? In my current game I'm playing fanatic egalitarian materialists who aspire to turn themselves in to a…I used the robotic mammalian portrait (the tall bulky machine with a glass front). ) Playing Tall is a very special type of empire. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. The player "developed" these systems to the heights of their abilities, using Habitats and Ringworlds. I too like to normally play wide, but I'll switch it up with a tall megacorp. Stellaris has generally only encouraged "wide" play (largely because wide empires always have more pop growth, which leads to more of everything else). Are you using the -dx11 option and borderless window, because trust me Stellaris is NOT single threaded, there was a dev blog post specifically discussing this in the past. The S Tier only features the best of the best Origin available in Stellaris. Flashbacks to Vic 2 sphere system. walter. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. Stellaris Tall vs. 20 comments. theBigTurnip385 Major. If you can't open branch offices for various reasons probably nearby AI hives, megacorps, xenophobes etc use early game economy bro expand or whatever and reform into a normal empire soon ditching the megacorp part of the build. growing pops requires going wide and in stellaris pops are everything. I really hope this video helps out everyone and thank you for watching! Nice to see some general coverage on the Tall Playstyle which arent specific Builds. large number of poorly developed planets. Ryika Jan 29, 2022 @ 11:08pm. That's a 70% increase. The Modding Den is a server dedicated to Stellaris Modding invite to our discord server. 3 beta). Weekly PSA's PSA- the definition of playing wide is disputed, and many people use systems as opposed to planets as the model in Stellaris. | Paradox Interactive Forums. ago The_Godfather69 The Definitive Guide For "How To Play Tall" In Stellaris Console Edition Video This video is my Guide for: How to Play Tall in Stellaris Console. Pacifism also allows the player to pick an exceptionally powerful Civic, Inward Perfection. You can rightfully play this by ONLY claiming systems with huge planets with lots of room for research and skipping over systems with. With the changes made in 3. If you're playing a standard planetary economy, you are either going to need to expand or get yourself some vassals. Wide involves expanding as much as possible and colonizing as many planets as possible. Method 1: Find a local AI, preferably one that is considerably more powerful, and between you and the baddies. I like my little bubble of about 20-25 systems, depending on what is in them or what they are. Ascendant clones get crazy huge specialist bonuses, so what you want to do is pack them into forge and factory worlds. If you play tall right, you can get more than 15000 tech per month mid game.